Perceptual qualities of Physiorelax® CBD cream compared to three other topical cannabidiol creams for musculoskeletal health care: an organoleptic approach by an expert panel

Application properties of Physiorelax® CBD compared to other CBD-containing creams

Abstract

Products with CBD are gaining ground in the cosmetic and massage cream market. However, the growing trend towards natural and effective pain relief and CBD-containing creams underscores the importance of making a well-informed product choice. By examining the organoleptic properties of these creams, we can obtain valuable insights into their performance and acceptance, contributing to a more informed market. To investigate the sensory profile of Physiorelax® CBD compared to three other CBD-infused topical massage creams, all aimed at providing natural relief for muscle and joint pain. An initial group of 20 panellists trained in sensory panel methodology since 2018 was convened to evaluate the four products. The presentation of the creams was randomised and blinded. Organoleptic characteristics were assessed using quantitative scores. The four creams exhibited a comparable sensory profile overall, with Physiorelax® CBD standing out in certain aspects related to appearance and pick-up characteristics. Physiorelax® CBD showed higher scores compared to Fisiocrem® Cannabis in integrity of shape (*P=0.006; *P=0.003 after 10 seconds), firmness (*P=0.006), and stickiness (*P=0.033). It also differs in initial glossiness (in terms of visible shine observed in the cream before application) compared to Cannaben® (*P=0.005), Alivium® CBD (*P<0.005), and Fisiocrem® Cannabis (*P=0.02), with a median of 70 (Alivium® CBD median of 50; Cannaben® and Fisiocrem® Cannabis median of 75). Physiorelax® CBD excels in some sensory characteristics of application compared to the other topical products tested. With a 1% CBD concentration and a blend of anti-inflammatory and analgesic natural ingredients, Physiorelax® CBD stands out as a strong option from a sensory and formulation perspective, showing properties that may be of interest for topical musculoskeletal products. However, no conclusions on clinical effectiveness can be inferred from this study.